A recent Guardian article titled “Why social media isn’t the magic bullet for self-epublished authors” has been making waves in the ebook world. While many disagree with Morrison’s opinion, there were also multiple factual mistakes in his article. We understand ebooks and social media can be vast, overwhelming fields, so we’re here to correct some of the most glaring inaccuracies.
__________________________________________________________________
“Self-styled eSpecialists such as Penn often invoke the 80/20 rule which advises that, as a sales person (in this case an author), you should spend 20% of your time writing and 80% of your time networking through social media.”
We have been unable to find any articles on Penn’s site which espouse this particular 80/20 rule. To the contrary, Penn has an article detailing ways to fit writing into your schedule. In another post, she outlines time management strategies (with no mention of spending 80% of your time marketing).
The 80/20 rule may have been a rewording of the Pareto principle. In business terms, it’s linked to the idea that 80% of your sales come from 20% of your customers. It’s about refining your business to achieve better results, not a breakdown of an average day.
__________________________________________________________________
“She claims that when tweeting and Facebooking you should spend ’80% of your time posting about things other than your book, and 20% selling’….Margulies advocates that authors blog and tweet about hobbies and personal activities: things you like, and which you think will draw other people to you. Essentially, 80% of your tweeting should be about cats, food, sport, what’s happening outside your window – all the things that millions of non-writers tweet about.”
This 80/20 rule is one of the principles of social media marketing. Morrison misses the boat on this one by implying 80% of the tweets should be about your personal life. This isn’t true; tweets don’t have to be only promotional or personal. With this rule, the 80% refers to tweets within your industry. For writers, that could be tweeting about the writing process, asking and answering publishing questions, participating in ebook-related Twitter chats, linking to industry news, or using hashtags such as #writetip to share advice. Certainly, talking about your pets and vacations can put a human side to your account, but those things are far from the focus. 80% of your tweet should serve to establish you as a credible figure in your field; 20% of the tweets should be links to your products.
__________________________________________________________________
“Most self-epublished authors hold down a day job, so let’s give them three hours a day, after work, for author activities. That’s 1,095 hours a year. Reduce this to 20% (since you have to spend 80% of your time covertly self-promoting online), and you get 219 writing hours a year, which works out as 18 12-hour days to write a book.”
This paragraph is based on a misquoted principle. These numbers are entirely irrelevant.
__________________________________________________________________
“If you want to learn their methods, you can attend one of the hundreds of new courses that have sprung up, and pay hundreds of pounds to master your 140 characters.”
True, there are sites which charge a lot to teach you about social media. There are many sites which offer free advice on tweeting and self-promotion, PopularSoda included. Our personal favorites include Duolit, Wise Ink, Jane Friedman, and Joanna Penn, as well as the Twitter accounts of Writer.ly, Jonathan Gunson, and Porter Anderson.
__________________________________________________________________
“Book Tweeting Service will write your tweets for you. Its tweet plans start with a one-day plan at $29 (£18). While this frees time to actually write, the downside is that your tweets may not come across as particularly “you”, which might alienate any followers you already had.”
Book Tweeting Service is just that: a service which will tweet about your books. They don’t write personalized tweets for private accounts (at least, not yet). The service is more like a billboard and less like a ghostwriter. They’ll blast sales links to your books on their accounts, which may be useful in conjunction with other social media tools, such as book tours and guest posting. They’re not intended to be a year-round service, which makes the exorbitant figure of £10,000 completely nonsensical. If there’s any confusion about the distinction, their Twitter profile should clear it up: “We promote your latest release, author website, book blog, book trailers etc to 60,000+ genuine followers on our Twitter accts. Please book early!”
__________________________________________________________________
“3. Get family, friends and Facebook friends to post reviews on Amazon”
The section under this bullet point starts off talking about Amazon, then shifts to Facebook, and inexplicably ends with a paragraph about social media in general. Let’s talk just about Amazon right now:
It’s true that receiving a bunch of reviews at once will bump up your book in the Amazon rankings. However, we’ve not seen pleas for fake five-star reviews met with anything but derision. On reddit, a thread from last year involved a self-published author soliciting positive reviews for his ebook. Because of the backlash, he deleted his account.
However, it’s possible to use these reviews in a legitimate way. In practice, we’ve seen writing communities band together in workshopping a piece, then reviewing the finished ebook as soon as it goes live on Amazon. We can’t think of better reviewers than people who are genuinely interested in it.
__________________________________________________________________
“But does giving your books away for free work? A test case is another author I know who went on to the Amazon free deal for a day and entered the top 10 Kindle Free Chart. He had 700 downloads within four hours. However, over the next day, when the price had gone back to £4.99, and in the three weeks that followed, the total number of copies sold was zero. He had, somehow, failed to build his platform.”
Morrison doesn’t mention the writer involved, so we can’t check his back catalogue. And the back catalogue is the yin to free ebooks’ yang. Yes, it used to be that offering a book for free was enough to stimulate sales. As the market became saturated, that’s no longer the case. These days, offering free ebooks is a strategy best employed when you have other ebooks which aren’t free. It seems strange, but it makes perfect sense. If you give away a book for free and impress your readers, what does that reader do next? If you have multiple ebooks in your back catalogue, the reader may go searching for more. But if you’ve only one book, the reader has no choice but to move on.
__________________________________________________________________
“In publishing terms it has recently been revealed that 10% of all self-epublishers make £75% of all the money; that 50% of self-published ebooks make less than $500 a year (£320, or 87p a day); and that 25% doesn’t cover the costs of production.”
We’ve spoken with dozens of authors who realize they will probably not become rich (or even solvent) through ebook sales. Besides that, though, these statistics don’t differentiate between high-quality ebooks and error-ridden (yet published) first drafts. Quality control is another issue entirely, but the point remains: not everyone should be making money from self-publishing simply because they have the ability to self-publish.
__________________________________________________________________
“A small number of writers make a lot and everyone else wallows in the doldrums of minuscule sales. The only difference is that those at the top are selling 100,000 copies at 99p, not at £4.99, or £8.99 – which in real terms represents a massive shrinkage of the market.”
We’re wondering what he means by “shrinkage of the market”. The sales seem to be the same. Only the price has changed, and that’s for the better. PaidContent has a great breakdown of author percentage profits using the example of Eric Goldman and Rebecca Tushnet. Goldman is quoted in the article:
“[A] $150 casebook may have a $110 price wholesale (or less). At 10% royalties to the authors, Rebecca and I would share $11. At the $10 download price, Scribd takes $2.25 a download, leaving us author royalties of $7.75.”
On the smaller scale of £8.99 and 99p, we can use similar math. It’s not uncommon for a writer to receive 15% from the sale of an £8.99 traditionally published book. This is about 60pp profit for the author. An ebook selling for £1.49 would net the author £0.97 from Amazon’s 70% royalty plan. The author makes more money per sale with the ebook.
__________________________________________________________________
“A new study by Reuters shows that four out of five Facebook users have never bought a product or service as a result of advertising or comments on the social network site. Facebook. Facebook can’t prove that it can monetise its 900 million-strong base of users, and as a result it has lost 26% of its value since the IPO launch.”
Facebook is only one site in the social media constellation. Besides Facebook, sites like Twitter, Goodreads, Pinterest, Smashwords, Tumblr, and independent forums provide online social opportunities to connect with potential readers or other selfpub authors. Besides Twitter and Facebook, no other social media sites were seriously discussed in this article.
__________________________________________________________________
“There may be hundreds or thousands more Kindle authors out there who are not reporting their astronomic sales, but given that Kindle authors spend 80% of their time self-promoting, one assumes we’d have heard about them.”
The 80% self-promotion idea has already been discussed here.
__________________________________________________________________
“Or is [Amazon] protecting itself from the accusation that it is the only winner in an online market intended to skim millions from millions of hopeful new writers, who themselves will only ever see minuscule returns on their investment and effort? “
We’ve already shown how authors can make more money per sale with ebooks than traditional publishing. The end profits will be about the same per unit. Of course, there’s the possiblity for hard-copy books to sell more units because of their bookstore presence. According to Morrison himself, though, “It also turns out that the ebook market now looks a lot like the old mainstream model. A small number of writers make a lot and everyone else wallows in the doldrums of minuscule sales. “
This discussion ignores another issue entirely: writers who cannot get their manuscripts accepted and traditionally published. Agents do not accept all manuscripts. Amazon does. We’d rather have 100 sales of our books in a year than have our manuscripts sit abandoned in a desk drawer, rejected time and again.
__________________________________________________________________
“Do you want to spend 80% of 80% of your time Facebooking about cats in the hope that you’ll make a 2.12% increase in sales on a book you had to write in 18 days? Do you want to spend 80% of your time creating unpaid market propaganda for the social media industry?”
Again, these percentages do not seem to come from any of the named sources.


Jul 31, 2012 @ 09:44:09
A carefully deliverd dismissal of what was a misconceived article. I find myself agreeing with the points you make here. Anyone venturing into this world is prepared for slow growth . Wendy
Jul 31, 2012 @ 18:21:29
Thanks for your reply, Wendy. Glad to see you’re still following the blog.
Jul 31, 2012 @ 18:13:31
Read the article a bit more closley.. you vain and deluded people.
Jul 31, 2012 @ 18:16:31
It is a very good article. It reveals many uncomfortable truthes for the vain and deluded self-righteous and self-published.
Jul 31, 2012 @ 18:17:55
Could you be more specific about these uncomfortable “truthes”?
Jul 31, 2012 @ 18:25:53
You know full well..that if you have to pay to have your work published..you are already on the wrong side of everything. Every single self-published author is ‘misunderstood’ and a genius in waiting.
I wrote this a while back and I think it still stands in terms of the self-delusion and general daftness?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2010/feb/04/vanity-self-publish
Jul 31, 2012 @ 20:54:54
I agree with your stance on vanity publishing. However, I draw a distinction between vanity publishing and self-publishing, especially in terms of ebooks. Here are my thoughts:
In vanity publishing, you pay one company to take care of your book, soup to nuts. Editing, cover design, marketing, and printing is all done under one roof. There’s virtually no choice besides which company to use– you’re forced to use their in-house team. In self-publishing ebooks, you are the publisher. Necessarily, you take over the costs and responsibilities of paying editors, finding a designer, and marketing the ebook. However, there are far more choices here. You can choose not to use an editor (which is unwise), or you can spend time researching reputable freelance editors and choose for yourself. It does take more effort, but you’ll have far more control over the finished product.
There’s no fee to put your book up on Amazon. There are only fees associated with getting your book ready for sale, which traditional publishers usually cover. The main difference is that in self-publishing, you pay for chosen production costs up front and keep more profit per unit, while in traditional publishing, you pay nothing up front, yet end up paying indirectly (and indefinitely) through much higher commission fees. And in vanity publishing, you keep all the profits, but pay very high production fees with little control over the process.
Aug 01, 2012 @ 00:11:41
Self-publishing fiction means that you pay to see you book in print. Whatever argument you might use..there is an element of vanity in that.
Aug 01, 2012 @ 00:37:53
You don’t necessarily have to pay in order to self-publish a book. If you’re going through a vanity press, then yes, you pay for their services. If you’re self-publishing on Amazon, you can edit your own story, create a cover, and format the book. Going it alone isn’t a good business decision, but you’d pay nothing to see your book for sale. You’d only have Amazon take their cut of your profits (which is a smaller cut than a traditional publisher’s).
I agree that there’s an element of vanity in believing in your story to the point where you’d do anything to get it out in the world. However, if you’ve been turned down by traditional publishing channels because your book is not marketable (as opposed to being unreadable), ebook self-publishing may give you your only outlet.
I’d also argue that there’s a degree of vanity in thinking that your traditionally published book is inherently better than any self-published ebook. Traditional publishing has always been a crapshoot. Dozens of writers, from J.K. Rowling and Stephen King to Vonnegut and Kerouac, received rejection letters before becoming published. Manuscripts aren’t evaluated in a vacuum; they can and have been rejected for reasons other than a lack of literary merit.
Just because the author does a lot of marketing doesn't mean the publisher can't help - The Shatzkin Files
Aug 01, 2012 @ 23:27:47
Aug 02, 2012 @ 15:01:15
‘Dozens of writers, from J.K. Rowling and Stephen King to Vonnegut and Kerouac, received rejection letters before becoming published.’
They did indeed..but they didn’t make arses of themselves by self-publishing their work.. did they?
Because their writing (unlike my dyslexic spelling) was good. So don’t be quoting them as any kind of example please.
Aug 02, 2012 @ 19:53:45
Come on now, you’re just being silly if you think Kerouac had an opportunity to self-publish an ‘On the Road’ ebook before the internet was even invented.
My point was, publishing houses are made up of people, and people make mistakes. People in publishing houses have rejected some of the biggest and most important books of our time. It’s ridiculous to hold up traditional publishing as some infallible culture barometer when it’s clearly subject to changing markets, fickle readers, and human error.
Aug 03, 2012 @ 04:08:30
The whole “social media and e-publish your way to fame” thing is a cynical money-making gimmick, somewhere between “self help guide to becoming a millionaire” thing and “how to get your book published”. Both of these phenomena may or may not help anyone interested in making money or getting published, but they are guaranteed to help the person selling the advice.
The mercilessly-cynical publishing industry will have thought of using social media to boost sales long before it even dawned on any self-publishing writers. There are plenty of authors who maintain a social media presence, but the successful ones are usually those who engage with their readers and especially writers at all levels.
Self-publishing (crossing over with e-publishing) is the elephant in the room that can’t be ignored. There was a spat last month at Harrogate between the wonderfully-cynical (published and self-published) Stephen Leather and the publishers’ association president Ursula Mackenzie (CEO of Little Brown). Part of this was egged up by the event host, but there is no doubt of the interests involved. There are accusations of selling-out and so on, but the publishing industry did that when they took on “50 Shades of Grey” and shamelessly flogged (?) it to the four-books-a-year Tesco and Asda (T&A?) market. Waterstones is increasingly full of stuff I do not want to read, aimed at a narrower readership. It appears to be a spiral of decline with no end in sight.
My guess is that the mainstream market/ top 300/ 4-books-a-year stuff will eventually shift entirely to e-book (or print on demand) and that will lead to another seismic shock to the print publishing industry. There will always be a desire for printed books, which will sustain physical bookshops as the sort of coffee-shops and browsing houses they are now, or niche market/second hand stores.
There is the writers vs publishers issue as well. Publishing has contracted, with lines leading up to the Big Six conglomerates. Like any multinational, they care about balance sheets and market share. Titles are commissioned on business risk and marketability. 100 authors sell 10% of titles. I listened to a director (can’t remember which of the six) who talked about signing two “unknown” authors – one was “Marley and Me”, one was “Tuesdays with Morrie” and both were established journalists. Such is the rarefied world of big publishing (although I did hear of someone near my home town who was picked up for a 3 book deal, so people do still get through the net).
The silver lining to this cloud is the independent publishing sector, which is partly facilitated by social media and e-publishing.
Aug 03, 2012 @ 04:35:32
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/aug/02/self-published-authors-bestseller-ebooks
Rejection Has Many Names « ScriptRod
Aug 03, 2012 @ 08:38:35
Aug 05, 2012 @ 11:16:28
What interesting comments. I had no idea I was vain and deluded.
Aug 06, 2012 @ 15:27:13
To throw fuel on the fire: http://www.iwassociation.com/sifting-truth-famous-self-published-authors/
I’m thrilled to find so many in the literary world to be “vain and deluded.” It is an honor to read their work.